The Practical Dilemmas and Optimization Paths of Internationalization Governance in Private Higher Education Institutions under the Belt and Road Initiative
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors
-
-
Rakhimov Olim Khamidovich
Associate professor, PhD in Economical Sciences, Bukhara State University, Uzbekistan -
Zhang Meimei
PhD Candidate, Bukhara State University
-
- Keywords:
- Belt and Road Initiative; private universities; higher education internationalization; governance mechanisms; international cooperation
- Abstract
- With the ongoing implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative, international cooperation in higher education has continued to expand, and private universities have increasingly participated in cross-border educational activities. Despite this progress, the development of internationalization governance mechanisms in private universities has lagged behind practical expansion, giving rise to a range of governance challenges. Drawing on the perspectives of collaborative governance and university governance modernization, this study examines the concept, key challenges, and improvement paths of internationalization governance in private universities. An analytical framework is developed around four interrelated dimensions—governance actors, governance structure, governance operation mechanisms, and governance safeguard mechanisms. The analysis indicates that current governance difficulties are mainly reflected in weak coordination among key actors, underdeveloped governance structures, inefficiencies in the operation of international cooperation, and insufficient safeguard and risk prevention mechanisms. These issues are closely related to limitations in institutional support, constrained governance capacity, and the growing complexity of the international cooperation environment. To address these challenges, the paper proposes strengthening multi-actor coordination, improving internal governance arrangements, enhancing the effectiveness of cooperation mechanisms, and reinforcing governance safeguards and risk management systems. The study offers theoretical insights and practical implications for improving governance capacity and supporting the sustainable internationalization of private universities within the Belt and Road context
- References
-
[1] Altbach, P. G., Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and
realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305.
[2] de Wit, H. (2020). Internationalization of higher education: The need for a more ethical and
qualitative approach. Journal of International Students, 10(1), i–iv.
[3] Yue, X. (2022). Higher education under the Belt and Road Initiative. International Higher Education,
108, 18–20.
[4] Wu, D. (2020). Institutional dilemmas and governance innovation in private higher education in
China. Higher Education Research, 41(5), 40–47.
[5] Ansell, C., Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public
Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
[6] Zhou, G. (2021). Governance logic of China’s higher education opening-up in the new era. China
Higher Education Research, (9), 5–11.
[7] Ma, L. (2020). Theoretical logic and implementation paths of university governance modernization.
Educational Research, (1), 5–13.
[8] Li, L. (2020). Governance issues in international cooperation of higher education. China Higher
Education Research, (12), 12–18.
[9] Bie, D., Liu, X. (2019). University governance structure and modernization of governance capacity.
Higher Education Research, 40(10), 1–9.
[10] Marginson, S., Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher
education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 281–309.
[11] Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., Rumbley, L. E. (2019). Trends in global higher education: Tracking
an academic revolution. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
[12] OECD. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
[13] UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? Paris: UNESCO
Publishing.
[14] World Bank. (2020). The future of higher education: Global trends and implications. Washington,
DC: World Bank.
[15] Knight, J. (2015). International universities: Misunderstandings and emerging models? Journal of
Studies in International Education, 19(2), 107–121.
[16] Marginson, S. (2018). Higher education, economic inequality and social mobility in East Asia.
International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 4–11.
[17] Mok, K. H. (2016). Massification of higher education, graduate employment and social mobility in
the Greater China region. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 51–71.
[18] Chou, M. H., Ravinet, P. (2015). The rise of higher education diplomacy. International Journal of
Higher Education, 4(1), 12–25.
[19] Liu, W. (2021). Higher education cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative: Opportunities
and challenges. Higher Education Policy, 34(2), 367–385.
[20] President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2019). Decree No. UP-5847: Concept for the
development of the higher education system of the Republic of Uzbekistan until 2030. Tashkent.
[21] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2019). Action plan for education under
the Belt and Road Initiative. Beijing.
[22] de Wit, H., Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and
recommendations. International Higher Education, 104, 2–4.
[23] Teichler, U. (2017). Internationalisation trends in higher education and the changing role of
international student mobility. Journal of International Mobility, 5(1), 177–216.
[24] Scott, P. (2015). The globalisation of higher education. International Journal of Educational
Management, 29(6), 669–676.
[25] Altbach, P. G. (2020). Global perspectives on higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press.